A passive infrared night vision system optional on the Grand Cherokee Overland/Summit helps the driver to more easily detect people, animals or other objects in front of the vehicle at night. Using an infrared camera to detect heat, the system then displays the image on a monitor in the dashboard. The Land Cruiser doesn’t offer a night vision system.
The Jeep Grand Cherokee (except Laredo)’s optional360-degree camera can be optionally equipped with washers for its front and rear cameras, ensuring crystal-clear visibility in any weather condition. Conversely, the Toyota Land Cruiser only offers a rear camera washer, which may not provide the same level of all-weather performance.
For better protection of the passenger compartment, the Grand Cherokee uses safety cell construction with a three-dimensional high-strength frame that surrounds the passenger compartment. It provides extra impact protection and a sturdy mounting location for door hardware and side impact beams. The Land Cruiser uses a body-on-frame design, which has no frame members above the floor of the vehicle.
Both the Grand Cherokee and the Land Cruiser have standard driver and passenger frontal airbags, front side-impact airbags, driver and front passenger knee airbags, side-impact head airbags, front seatbelt pretensioners, height adjustable front shoulder belts, plastic fuel tanks, four-wheel antilock brakes, traction control, electronic stability systems to prevent skidding, crash mitigating brakes, daytime running lights, lane departure warning systems, blind spot warning systems, rearview cameras, rear cross-path warning, available all wheel drive, around view monitors and driver alert monitors.
The National Highway Traffic Safety Administration does 35 MPH front crash tests on new vehicles. In this test, results indicate that the Jeep Grand Cherokee is safer than the Toyota Land Cruiser:
|
Grand Cherokee |
Land Cruiser |
OVERALL STARS |
5 Stars |
4 Stars |
|
Driver |
|
STARS |
5 Stars |
4 Stars |
HIC |
129 |
205 |
Neck Injury Risk |
21% |
38.7% |
Neck Stress |
152 lbs. |
517 lbs. |
|
Passenger |
|
STARS |
5 Stars |
4 Stars |
HIC |
137 |
238 |
Chest Compression |
.6 inches |
.7 inches |
Neck Injury Risk |
28% |
38.5% |
Neck Stress |
125 lbs. |
277 lbs. |
Neck Compression |
41 lbs. |
84 lbs. |
Leg Forces (l/r) |
400/347 lbs. |
414/404 lbs. |
New test not comparable to pre-2011 test results. More stars = Better. Lower test results = Better.
The National Highway Traffic Safety Administration does side impact tests on new vehicles. In this test, which crashes the vehicle into a post at 20 MPH, results indicate that the Jeep Grand Cherokee is safer than the Toyota Land Cruiser:
|
Grand Cherokee |
Land Cruiser |
|
Into Pole |
|
STARS |
5 Stars |
5 Stars |
Max Damage Depth |
14 inches |
16 inches |
Spine Acceleration |
41 G’s |
42 G’s |
Hip Force |
528 lbs. |
702 lbs. |
New test not comparable to pre-2011 test results. More stars = Better. Lower test results = Better.
Instrumented handling tests conducted by the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration and analysis of its dimensions indicate that the Grand Cherokee, with its four-star roll-over rating, is 5.5% to 6.7% less likely to roll over than the Land Cruiser, which received a three-star rating.